AT THE CROSSROADS OF IMAGINATION: LIVING LAB APPROACH FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55877/kkmp.2026.1.680Keywords:
social innovation, living labs, sustainable development goals, academic institutionsAbstract
This article addresses momentum-gaining approaches to enhancing imagination, ambition, and cross-sectoral collaboration in efforts to advance the UN Sustainable Development Goals. As a practical, needs-driven response to the increasing social and ecological challenges, it foregrounds open social innovation as a solution, living labs as an approach, as well as open and citizen science as methods for co-creating more sustainable futures, with particular emphasis on the role of academic institutions. The article combines a review of recent scientific literature with a brief empirical illustration from Viskaļi – The Institute of Design for Quality of Life in Riga, Latvia, developed within a broader case study. Based on this analysis, the article outlines several directions through which academic institutions can contribute to SDG implementation by fostering locally grounded, co-created social innovations that enhance quality of life. The need for expanding imaginaries towards a hopeful future as means for meaningful societal transformation is emphasised.
Downloads
References
Arias, A., Pennese, C., Grijalba, O., et al. (2025). Application of Living Lab Concept: Where, How and for What Is Being Used in Europe to Support Energy, Social and Environmental Transition. Sustainability, 17 (6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062727
Biedrība Free Riga (b. d.). Kas ir Viskaļi? Info plakāts. Pieejams: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15etYDWZNAsSuNjq5tcZ99z1UfZndanBX/view (skatīts 28.04.2025.).
Carayannis, E., Campbell, D. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st cen-tury fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46 (3/4). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
Cukura, P. (2025). Sociālās ekonomikas organizācijas pēcizaugsmes kontekstā. “Viskaļi – Dzīves kvalitātes dizaina institūts” piemērs. Maģistra darbs. Rīga: Latvijas Kultūras Akadēmija un Rīgas Tehniskā universitāte. 160. lpp.
Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M. (2025). Urban Living Labs as Exponent of Co-creation. In: S. Shtylla,
M. C. Olivas, A. Sánchez, et al. (eds.). Designing Futures. SCI 2023. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham, pp. 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63061-3_3
European Network of Living Labs (n.d.). What are Living Labs? Pieejams: https://enoll.org/living-labs/#living-labs (skatīts 11.05.2025.).
Hattle, A., et al. (2025). An active academia for peace and sustainability. Peace and Sustainability, 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nerpsj.2025.100004
Hopkins, R. (2025). How to Fall in Love with the Future: A Time Traveller’s Guide to Changing the World. London: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Hossain, M., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M. (2019). A systematic review of living lab lite-rature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, pp. 976–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257
Līcīte, L., Surikova, S., Grīnberga-Zālīte, G. (2019). Sociālās inovācijas būtība un izaicinā-jumi sociālās inovācijas pētniecībā. No: K. Oganisjana (red.). Sociālā inovācija: izaici-nājumi un risinājumi Latvijā. Rīga: RTU izdevniecība, 16.–37. lpp.
Nicolopoulou, K., Karataş-Özkan, M., Vas, C., Nouman, M. (2015). An incubation perspec-tive on social innovation: The London Hub – a social incubator. R&D Management, 47 (3), pp. 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12179
OECD (2023). What is the social and solidarity economy? A review of concepts. Pieejams: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/what-is-the-social-and-solidarity-economy-a-review-of-concepts_dbc7878d-en.html (skatīts 02.01.2025.).
OECD (2024). Recommendation of the Council on the Social and Solidarity Economy and Social Innovation. OECD legal instruments. Pieejams: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0472 (skatīts 03.01.2025.).
Oganisjana, K. (2019). Ievads: Sociālās inovācijas pētījuma metodoloģija. No: K. Oganisjana (red.). Sociālā inovācija: izaicinājumi un risinājumi Latvijā. Rīga: RTU Izdevniecība, 9.–15. lpp.
Pacheco, J. N., Turro, A., Urbano, D. (2025). Open social innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124160
Pel, B., Wittmayer, J., Dorland, J., Søgaard Jørgensen, M. (2019). Unpacking the social innovation ecosystem: an empirically grounded typology of empowering network constellations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33 (3) pp. 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2019.1705147
Purcell, W. M., Henriksen, H., Spengler, J. D. (2019). Universities as the engine of transfor-mational sustainability toward delivering the sustainable development goals: “Living labs” for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20 (8), pp. 1343–1357. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2019-0103
Schaeffer, V., Matt, M. (2016). Development of academic entrepreneurship in a non-mature context: the role of the university as a hub-organisation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28 (9/10), pp. 724–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1247915
Unceta, A., Castro-Spila, J., García Fronti, J. (2017). The three governances in social innova-tion. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30 (4), pp. 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1279537
UNESCO (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. SC-PCB-SPP/2021/ OS/UROS. https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546
United Nations (n.d.). The 17 goals. Pieejams: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (skatīts 16.01.2026.).
Vitali, L. (2025). What if we could uncancel the future? Dust Magazine. Pieejams: https://dustmagazine.com/what-if-we-could-uncancel-the-future/ (skatīts 10.01.2026.).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Krustpunkti: kultūras un mākslas pētījumi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
