HYBRIDITY, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND SOCIAL IMPACT: A STUDY OF CREATIVE SOCIAL ENTERPRISES IN LATVIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol32.583Keywords:
creative social enterprises, cultural and creative industries , social entrepreneurship, social impactAbstract
This research enhances understanding of creative and social entrepreneurship by exploring the nature of creative social enterprises (CSE) in Latvia to better understand their hybrid goals, which affect their ability to account for social impact. The research employs a qualitative approach, utilizing one case study and legal document analysis, to examine the CSE from practitioners’ perspectives on navigating enterprises and conducting impact assessment. Findings show that while CSEs offer innovative models for connecting creativity and social value, they encounter challenges in formalizing impact assessment due to limited resources, competing goals, and a hybrid organizational structure. The research enhances understanding of accountability in hybrid organizations and underscores the need for more tailored approaches to impact assessment.
Downloads
References
Angelini, F., Castellani, M. (2019). Cultural and economic value: a critical review. Journal of Cultural Economics, 43(2), 173–188. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/48698089
Barinaga, E. (2023). From Evaluation to Valorising: Three Moments in the Making of Social Impact Value. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2023.2262158
Collins, P., Murtagh, A. (2018). Creative Economy Index. Galway: Whitaker Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway. Available: https://mycreativeedge.eu/app/uploads/2018/02/creative-economy-index-report-final.pdf
Dekker, E. (2015). Two approaches to study the value of art and culture, and the emergence of a third. Journal of Cultural Economics, 39(4), 309–326. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44289569
Doherty, B., Haugh, H., Lyon, F. (2014). Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 418. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
Dupain, W., et al. (2022). The State of Social Enterprise in Europe – European Social Enterprise Monitor 2021-2022. Hague: Euclid Network.
Ebrahim, A., et al. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001
Esposito, P., et al. (2021). Understanding Social Impact and Value Creation in Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Italian Civil Service. Sustainability, 13(17), 4058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074058
Ferreira, S. et al. (2023). Social enterprises in culture and the arts: institutional trajectories of hybridisation in the Portuguese changing cultural mix. International Journal of Cultural Policy. 29(7), 926–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2022.2144843
Frey, B. S. (2008). What Values Should Count in the Arts? The Tension between Economic Effects and Cultural Value. In: Hutter, M., Throsby, D. (scientific eds.), Beyond Price. Value in Culture, Economics, and the Arts. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 261–269.
Labklājības ministrija. (2022). Informatīvs ziņojums par sociālo uzņēmumu darbību un attīstību laika posmā no 2020. gada 1. aprīļa līdz 2022. gada 1. aprīlim. [online]. Kultūras Ministrija. Available: https://polsis.mk.gov.lv/documents/7422
Labklājības ministrija. (2024). Sociālo uzņēmumu darbības pārskati. Available: https://www.lm.gov.lv/lv/socialo-uznemumu-darbibas-parskati
Labklājības ministrija. (2025). Sociālo uzņēmumu reģistrs. Available: https://www.lm.gov.lv/lv/socialo-uznemumu-registrs
Liket, K. C., Rey-Garcia, M., Maas, K. E. H. (2014). Why Aren’t Evaluations Working and What to Do About It. A Framework for Negotiating meaningful evaluation in nonprofits. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013517736
Loots, E. (2023). Entrepreneurship research in cultural and creative industries: Identifying key ingredients of a ‘hodgepodge’. In: Hill, I., Elias, S. R. S. T. A., Dobson, S. and Jones, P. (eds.), Creative (and Cultural) Industry Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century (Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research), pp. 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2040-72462023000018a002 pp25
McQuilten, G., Warr, D., Humphery, K., Spiers, A. (2020), Ambivalent entrepreneurs: Arts-based social enterprise in a neoliberal world. Social Enterprise Journal, 16(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-03-2019-0015
Molecke, G., Pinske, J. (2017). Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 550–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.05.003
Neergaard, H., Ulhøi, J. P. (2007). Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Noya, A. (2015). Policy Brief on Social Impact Measurement for Social Enterprises. Policies for Social Entrepreneurship. Luxembourg: OECD Publishing. Available: https://www.oecd.org/social/PB-SIM-Web_FINAL.pdf
Pedro, S. P., Ballesteros, C. (2021). Proposals for Social Impact Measurement and Management. In Search of a Common Language: Report of the Social Impact Chair. Open Value Foundation, Universidad Pontificia Comillas. Available: https://files.griddo.comillas.edu/abstract-proposals-for-social-impact-measure-management.pdf
Portales, L. (2019). Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship. Fundamentals, Concepts, and Tools. Cham: Palgrave.
Zeiļa, R. (2024). Expert interview: director of the Social Entrepreneurship Association of Latvia (SEAL). Interviewed by Asnāte Kalēja on 13.05.2024.
Ridder, H. G. (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business Research, 10(2), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z
Sabeti, H. (2009). The Emerging Fourth Sector. Fourth Sector Network Concept Working Group. Available: https://www.aspeninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/files/content/docs/pubs/4th%20sector%20paper%20%20exec%20summary%20FINAL.pdf
Saebi, T., et al. (2019). Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318793196
Social Enterprise Law, Section 2. (2018) [online]. Adopted by Cabinet Order No. 212, Latvijas Vēstnesis. Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/294484
The European Social Enterprise Monitor. (2025). Latvian Social Enterprise Monitor 2023–2024. Available: https://sua.lv/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/esem-analysis-all-data-analysis_eng-1.pdf
Ūlande, M., Līcīte, L. (2018). Sociālā uzņēmējdarbība Latvijā: īss esošās situācijas pārskats. Ekosistēmas kartēšana. LSUA. Available: https://sua.lv/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/LSUA_report_2-ENG.pdf
Wells, J. R. (2016). Entrepreneurial Axiology: Hybrid values in creative social enterprise. [online] 39th Annual Conference of the Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 26–27 October 2016. Available: https://pure.strath.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/67503068/Wells_ACISBE_2016_Entrepreneurial_axiology_hybrid_values_in_creative_social_enterprise.pdf
Wells, J. R. (2024). Creative social entrepreneuring as a vehicle for creative emancipation. Creative Industries Journal, 17(2), 272–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2024.2363694
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Culture Crossroads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
