INTRODUCTION. FROM INVISIBLE TO VISIBLE: CHALLENGES IN ASSESSINGTHE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT IN CREATIVE AND CULTURAL INDUSTRIES IN LATVIA: INTRODUCING THE SPECIAL ISSUE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol32.674Abstract
In the context of public investment into culture and arts, an ever-present issue is that of impact measurement. The issue of impacts is often oversimplified, because of the need to express non-linear processes in linear, monetary terms (especially for policy purposes). On the one hand, there is a growing demand for evidence-based policy evaluation in this field [Evans 2005]. On the other hand, researchers have started a broader debate regarding intrinsic versus instrumental impacts of culture [Seaman 2020] leading to the debate on cultural value [Belfiore 2020]. Researchers also acknowledge that there is a lot of bad or unverifiable evidence of impact in cultural policy documents [Belfiore 2022], or they warn about hyperinstrumentalisation of cultural policy, where claims about the value of culture are irrelevant to political actors [Hadley and Grey 2017].
Downloads
References
Analītisko pētījumu un stratēģiju laboratorija (2007). Kultūras sektora ekonomiskā nozīme un ietekme Latvijā. Rīga: Analītisko pētījumu un stratēģiju laboratorija.
Baltic Project Consulting (2006). Kultūras nozares nozīme Latvijas tautsaimniecībā un ES struktūrfondu izmantošana kultūras vajadzībām. Rīga: Baltic Project Consulting.
Belfiore, E. (2020). Whose cultural value? Representation, power and creative industries.
International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26(3), 383–397.
Belfiore, E. (2022). Is it really about the evidence? argument, persuasion, and the power of
ideas in cultural policy. Cultural Trends, 31(4), 293–310.
Bonet, L., Calvano, G. (eds.). (2023). Measuring the Social Dimension of Culture: Handbook. Trànsit Projectes. Available: https://www.mesoc-project.eu/sites/default/files/2023-06/mesoc-handbook-final-june-2023.pdf (viewed 03.02.2026.)
Bonilla Berrocal, B., De Rosa, A., Auricchio, V. (2026). Beyond metrics: Social impact, assessment frameworks, and alternative evaluation methods, Culture Crossroads, Vol. 32, special issue “How to Make it Visible? Assessing Social and Economic Impact in Creative and Cultural Industries”.
Carnwaith, J. D., Brown, A. S. (2014). Understanding the value and impacts of cultural experiences – a literature review. Available: https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Understanding_the_Value_and_Impacts_of_Cultural_Experiences.pdf (viewed 12.12.2025.)
Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (European Commission) (2025). Culture and Health: Time to Act. Available: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/0432398 (viewed 03.02.2026.)
Ebrahim, A. (2019). Measuring Social Change. Performance and Accountability in a Complex World. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Enviroprojekts (2019). 2007.–2013. gada ES fondu plānošanas perioda Darbības programmas „Infrastruktūra un pakalpojumi” 3.4.3. pasākuma “Kultūrvides sociālekonomiskā ietekme” ietekmes un 2014.–2020. gada ES fondu plānošanas perioda (specifiskā atbalsta mērķa 5.6.1.) ieguldījumu kultūrvides attīstībā ieviešanas efektivitātes izvērtējums. Rīga: Enviroprojekts.
Evans, G. (2005). Measure for Measure: Evaluating the Evidence of Culture’s Contribution to Regeneration. Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, 42(5–6), 959–983.
Feor, L., Clarke, A., Dougherty, I. (2023). Social Impact Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions. World, 4(4), 816–837.
Hadley, S., Gray, C. (2017). Hyperinstrumentalism and cultural policy: means to an end or an end to meaning? Cultural Trends, 26(2), 95–106.
Herrero, L. C., et al. (2006). The Economic Impact of Cultural Events: A Case-Study of Salamanca 2002, European Capital of Culture. European Urban and Regional Studies, 13(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776406058946
Judrupa, I., Zemīte, I (2022). Mūzikas nozares ekonomiskās ietekmes novērtējums: Latvijas mūzikas nozares makroekonomiskie rādītāji un nozares ekonomiskais devums tautsaimniecībai. Rīga: Latvijas Kultūras akadēmija.
Kalēja, K. Zemite, I. (2026). Hybridity, Accountability, and Social Impact: A Study of Creative Social Enterprises in Latvia, Culture Crossroads, Vol. 32, special issue “How to Make it Visible? Assessing Social and Economic Impact in Creative and Cultural Industries”.
Kaygan. P. (2026). Quantifying the Economic Impact of Design: Assessment Tools Based on Design Maturity Levels, Culture Crossroads, Vol. 32, special issue “How to Make it Visible? Assessing Social and Economic Impact in Creative and Cultural Industries”.
Laķe, A., Tjarve, B., Grīnberga, L. (2015). Measuring social and economic impact of large scale cultural events: a social network analysis. Culture Crossroads, 7, 96–110.
Latvijas Kultūras akadēmija (2018). Pētījums par kultūras jomas nevalstisko organizāciju sociāli ekonomisko ietekmi. Available: https://lka.edu.lv/media/cms_page_media/153/ZINOJUMS_NVO_final_2018.pdf (viewed 03.02.2026.)
Latvijas Kultūras akadēmija (2019). Liepājas pilsētas kultūras un radošo industriju sociāli-ekonomiskā ietekme. Available: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y5x9hHV6e3V5XcbSqAJcxnA_IB3foI30/view?usp=sharing (viewed 03.02.2026.)
Latvijas Kultūras akadēmija (2025). “Liepāja – Eiropas kultūras galvaspilsēta 2027. gadā” novērtējums. Available: https://drive.google.com/file/d/126xB8JsnpkKRMfqzGOqdLoPz2jXNjdtj/view?usp=sharing (viewed 03.02.2026.)
Loots, E., Vermeulen, M. (2022). Assessing the impact of culture and creativity in society. Available: https://pure.eur.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/57958023/LOOTS_VERMEULEN_magazine_assessing_impact_culture_and_creativity_society_2022.pdf (viewed 02.12.2025.)
LZA Ekonomikas institūts (1998). Kultūras sektora tautsaimnieciskā nozīmīguma novērtējums. Rīga: LZA Ekonomikas institūts.
LZA Ekonomikas institūts (1999). Kultūras sektora tautsaimnieciskais nozīmīgums. Rīga: LZA Ekonomikas institūts.
LZA Ekonomikas institūts (2003). Kultūras nozares ieguldījuma tautsaimniecībā aprēķināšana. Rīga: LZA Ekonomikas institūts.
LZA Ekonomikas institūts (2008). Dziesmu un deju svētki mainīgā ekonomikas vidē. Rīga: LZA Ekonomikas institūts.
Loots, E., Vermeulen, M. (2022). Assessing the impact of culture and creativity in society: A magazine. Available: https://www.eur.nl/en/eshcc/media/2022-02-magazine-assessing-impact-culture-and-creativity-society (viewed 03.02.2026.)
Mair, J. (2019). The Routledge Handbook of Festivals. London: Routledge.
Mārketinga praktiķu Academia (2013). Pētījumu par masu pasākumu ietekmi uz ekonomiku pārskats. Rīga: Mārketinga praktiķu Academia.
MCM Statistics Working Group (2018). Measuring the economic value of cultural and creative industries. Available: https://www.arts.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/measuring-the-economic-value-of-cultural-and-creative-industries-statistics-working-group-of-the-meeting-of-cultural-ministers.pdf (viewed 02.12.2025.)
Muktupāvela, R., Laķe A. (eds.). (2018). Dziesmu un deju svētki: Tradīcijas anatomija. Rīga: Jāņa Rozes apgāds.
Nodibinājums Rīga 2014 (2015). Eiropas Kultūras galvaspilsētas Rīga 2014 programmas gala / ex-post iekšējais novērtējums. Rīga: Nodibinājums Rīga 2014.
Noonan, D. S. (2003). Contingent Valuation and Cultural Resources: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Literature. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27(3), 159–176.
Polivtseva, E. (2024). State of Culture Report. Culture Action Europe. Available: https:// cultureactioneurope.org/knowledge/state-of-culture-report/ (viewed 03.02.2026.)
Ranczakowska, A. M. (2026). Beyond Audit Culture: Reimagining Cultural Impact Through Rhizomatic Evaluation, Culture Crossroads, Vol. 32, special issue “How to Make it Visible? Assessing Social and Economic Impact in Creative and Cultural Industries”.
Sanul, G., Köse, S. (2026). Creative Newcomers and Rural Transformations: Rethinking Cultural Impact Assessment, Culture Crossroads, Vol. 32, special issue “How to Make it Visible? Assessing Social and Economic Impact in Creative and Cultural Industries”.
Seaman, B. A. (2020). Economic impact of the arts. In: Towse, R., Hernández, T. N. (eds.).
Handbook of Cultural Economics. UK, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 241–253.
Snowball, J. D. (2020). Cultural value. In: Towse, R., Navarrete Hernández, T. (eds.).
Handbook of Cultural Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 206–215.
Svempe, L. (2026). Cultural and Creative Industries: Key Players in Improving Adherence in Digital Healthcare, Culture Crossroads, Vol. 32, special issue “How to Make it Visible? Assessing Social and Economic Impact in Creative and Cultural Industries”.
Trešais tēva dēls (2012). Economic value and impact of public libraries in Latvia. Rīga: Trešais tēva dēls.
United Nations (2024). Creative Economy Outlook 2024. Available: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditctsce2024d2_en.pdf (viewed 28.11.2025.)
Vermeulen, M., Maas, K. (2021). Building Legitimacy and Learning Lessons: A Framework for Cultural Organizations to Manage and Measure the Social Impact of Their Activities. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 51(2), 97–112.
Vinogradova, L., Laķe, A. (2019). The role of emotions in the sustaining of tradition: The case of the Latvian song and dance celebration. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Cultural Studies,14(1), 1–15.
Zemīte, I., Vinogradova, L., Medne, N., Kalēja, A. (2024). Dziesmu un deju svētku ekonomiskā ietekme: XXVII Vispārējo latviešu Dziesmu un XVII Deju svētku piemērs. Pētījuma ziņojums. Rīga: Latvijas Nacionālais kultūras centrs; Latvijas Kultūras akadēmija.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Culture Crossroads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
